APARTMENT NEWS
ARCHIVES
2009:
Housing Bill Codified: Multifamily Dodges Bullet
- 052809
By: Chris Wood
Foreclosure amendments targeting multifamily housing stock not
included in Obama-signed legislation.
A broad housing bill that includes far-reaching efforts to reform
the nation’s housing and financial markets was signed by President
Barack Obama last week. Not included in the final version of the
bill were two amendments sponsored by U.S. Reps. Nydia Velazquez (D-N.Y.)
and Bob Filner (D-Calif.) and supported by U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer
(D-N.Y.), which the National Multi Housing Council (NMHC) says could
have an imperiling impact to multifamily operators and the
multifamily lending space.
Intended to protect affordable housing stock, particularly in New
York City, the amendments direct the U.S. Treasury and the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to create a loan
modification program allowing for government intervention in
multifamily properties considered at risk of foreclosure. That
intervention could include a restructuring of existing mortgages and
transference of the property through short-sale of deed in lieu of
foreclosure.
While the amendments were successfully attached to the House version
of the bill (H.R. 1728), Schumer was forced to withdraw the
amendments from the Senate version of the bill (S.B. 896) due to
point-of-order restrictions on modifications he sought just prior to
the Senate vote. Since the House passed the almost identical S.B.
896 to the President’s office rather than reconciling it with the
House bill, the amendments on H.R. 1728 were not included.
“As it stands right now, there is nothing moving,” says NMHC senior
vice president of government affairs Jim Arbury. “The thinking now
is that Velazquez and Filner will probably try to get the amendments
into a subsequent House bill, possibly attaching them to Section 8
voucher legislation. It is still a definite threat.”
Following his point-of-order withdrawal of the Senate amendments,
Schumer claimed that tens of thousands of New York City affordable
apartment units were in immediate peril of foreclosure. A press
release announcing his legislation claimed that 60,000 units were in
danger of what Schumer called “subprime crisis 2.0.” The press
release, which uses the terms “affordable housing” and “multifamily
apartment buildings” interchangeably, also warns of additional
multifamily mortgages at risk in Tennessee, Georgia, Florida,
Nevada, Texas, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Connecticut,
Oklahoma, Kentucky, Missouri, Mississippi, California, and
Massachusetts. Repeated calls to Schumer’s office requesting comment
and clarification on the amendments and the press release were not
returned.
In a March 18 letter to Treasury Sec. Timothy Geithner, Velazquez
and Schumer (along with U.S. Rep. Charles Rengel) requested that the
Obama administration create a Multifamily Preservation Program that
would assist in “deleveraging” multifamily housing stock at risk of
disinvestment and foreclosure. Specifically, the letter asks for HUD
to conduct physical inspections of multifamily properties that don’t
meet fair market value (defined as an inability of net operating
income to cover operation and maintenance of the property). A failed
physical inspection under the proposal would result in a “regulatory
default” and foreclosure of the property.
“The letter really shows their intent in this whole thing: to turn
who-knows-what type of multifamily real estate basically into public
or otherwise rent-controlled housing,” Arbury says, adding that the
legislation would have a chilling effect on what is already a frozen
credit market beyond GSE lending. “Just the threat that the Feds
could come in and foreclose and then get a low price an a property
to make it low-rent or affordable—whatever that means—what lender in
their right mind would ever lend into any property?”